La University Responsibility for Misconduct in Research
Abstract
As university research administrators weigh the challenges they will face in the future, misconduct in research undoubtedly looms large. At many universities, misconduct in research has garnered increasing amounts of time and expense. This paper suggests that these trends are unlikely to change in the near future, placing greater and greater pressure on university research administrators to deal responsibly and effectively with misconduct in research. This suggestion is based on the answers to four questions, followed by a listing of four responsibilities that all research universities should consider adopting.
Originalmente publicado en Research Management Review, Vol. 5, No. 2 (otoño de 1991), pp. 41-46. © National Council of University Research Administrators, 1991. Traducido al español con permiso del editor. Toda reproducción adicional está prohibida.
References
Koshland Jr., D. E. (1987, 9 de enero). Fraud in Science. Science, 235(4785), 141.
Federal Register. (1989, 8 de agosto). 54, 32446-32451.
Steneck, N. H. (1993). Fostering Responsible Conduct in Science and Engineering Research: Current University Policies and Actions. En Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine, Responsible Science, Vol. II: Background Papers and Resource Documents (pp. 26-49). Washington: The National Academies Press.
Copyright (c) 2011 Nicholas H. Steneck, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Los artículos emplean licencias de acceso abierto distribuido bajo los términos de la licencia de Creative Commons 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), la cual permite su uso,
distribución y reproducción de forma libre siempre y cuando el o los autores reciban el respectivo crédito.