The Logic of Qualitative Survey Research and its Position in the Field of Social Research Methods

  • Harrie Jansen, Ph.D. Kwalon Journal
Keywords: qualitative survey, statistical survey, diversity sample, diversity analysis, typology construction, combinatory analysis, holistic synthesis

Abstract

Many qualitative studies describe the diversity of certain cognitions or behaviors in a population by means of semi-structured interviews with a small sample of population members. Up to now this type of qualitative research remains undefined in the methodological literature, however. It is argued that most of these studies may well be typified by the label “qualitative survey”. While the statistical survey analyses frequencies in member characteristics in a population, the qualitative survey analyses the diversity of member characteristics within a population. The diversity of member characteristics may either be predefined or developed in open coding. Three levels of diversity analysis are defined: uni-dimensional description, multidimensional description and explanatory analysis, which may develop either in a concept-oriented or in a unit-oriented fashion.

Author Biography

Harrie Jansen, Ph.D., Kwalon Journal

El Dr. Harrie A. M. Jansen es el editor coordinador de KWALON, la revista holandesa de investigación cualitativa (http://www.kwalon.nl/). Hasta su retiro, fue profesor de sociología médica en la Erasmus University de Rotterdam y director de investigación en el IVO, el Instituto de Investigación de la Adicción de Rotterdam.

References

Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L., & Brennan, J. (Eds.) (2008). The Sage handbook of social research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Babbie, E. (1989). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Baker, C., Wuest, J., & Stern, P. N. (1992). Method slurring: The grounded theory/phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(11), 1355-60.
Becker, H. (1998). Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bernard, H. R. (2006). Science editing in the social sciences: Methods belong to all of us. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 91(July), 20-24.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. Londres: Unwin Hyman.
Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). “Clear as mud”: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. The International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/4521/3651 [Fecha de acceso: 27 de junio de 2005].
Carter, M. (2002). Husbands and maternal health matters in rural Guatemala: Wives’ report on their spouses’ involvement in pregnancy and birth. Social Science & Medicine, 55(3), 437-450.
Chamberlain, K. (1999). Methodolatry and qualitative health research. Journal of Health Psychology, 5(3), 285-296.
Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounded theory. En George Ritzer (Ed.), Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Blackwell Reference Online, http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/ [Fecha de acceso: 8 de agosto de 2007].
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Debski, R., & Gruba, P. (1999). A qualitative survey of tertiary instructor attitudes towards project-based CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(3), 219-239.
Dey, I. (2004). Grounded theory. En C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 80-93). Londres: Sage.
Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. The Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 230-251.
Dul, J., & Hak, T. (2008). Case study methodology in business research. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fink, A. (2003). The survey handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Freeman, A. C., & Sweeney, K. (2001). Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: Qualitative study. British Medical Journal, 323, 1100-1102.
Galtung, J. (1967). Theory and methods of social research. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Nueva York: Aldine.
Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. En N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 195-220). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hak, T., & Dul, J. (2009). Pattern matching. En A. J. Mills, G. Durepos & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 663-665). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kane, M. N. (2008). A qualitative survey of the attitudes of Catholic priests toward bishops and ministry following the sexual abuse revelations of 2002. Pastoral Psychology, 57, 183-198.
Kluge, S. (1999). Empirisch begründete Typenbildung. Zur Konstruktion von Typen und Typologien in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
Kluge, S. (2000). Empirically grounded construction of types and typologies in qualitative social research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1), Art. 14, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0001145 [Fecha de acceso: 8 de abril de 2007].
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1962). The sociology of empirical social research. American Sociological Review, 27(6), 757-767, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2090403 [Fecha de acceso: 20 de noviembre de 2009].
Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A., & Liao, F. T. (Eds.) (2004). The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Maso, I., & Smaling, A. (1998). Kwalitatief onderzoek: praktijk en theorie. Amsterdam: Boom.
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ragin, C. (1989). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ragin, C. (2007). Redesigning social inquiry: Set relations in social research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reichertz, J. (2009). Abduction: The logic of discovery of grounded theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(1), Art. 13, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1001135 [Fecha de acceso: 15 de enero de 2010].
Robinson, W. S. (1951). The logical structure of analytic induction. American Sociological Review, 16, 812-818.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 905-23.
Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F., & Silverman, D. (Eds.) (2004). Qualitative research practice. Londres: Sage.
Stenius, B., & Cunnington, A. M. (1972). House dust mites and respiratory allergy: A qualitative survey of species occurring in Finnish house dust. Scandinavian Journal of Respiratory Diseases, 53, 338-348.
Stoele, M. T. M., Luijendijk, D. J., Tiemijer, H., Heeringa, J., & Jansen, H. A. M. (2004). Langdurig gebruik van slaap- en kalmeringsmiddelen door ouderen. Rotterdam: IVO, Addiction Research Institute.
Vaus, D. de (2002). Surveys in social research. Londres: Routledge.
Verschuren, P., & Doorewaard, H. (1999). Designing a research project. Utrecht: Lemma.
Wester, F. P. J. (1995). Strategieën voor kwalitatief onderzoek. Bussum: Coutinho.
Wester, F. P. J. (2000). Methodische aspecten van kwalitatief onderzoek. En Fred P. J. Wester, A. Smaling & L. Mulder (Eds.), Praktijkgericht kwalitatief onderzoek (pp.15-40). Bussum, Netherlands: Coutinho.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Londres: Sage.
Published
2013-01-21
How to Cite
Jansen, H. (2013). The Logic of Qualitative Survey Research and its Position in the Field of Social Research Methods. Paradigmas, 5(1), 39-72. Retrieved from https://publicaciones.unitec.edu.co/index.php/paradigmas/article/view/42
Section
Artículos